Is O.J Simpson guilty or not in your opinion ?

Question

Is O.J Simpson guilty or not in your opinion ?

Answer 1

If the glove don't fit.. you must aquit!!!



Karma's a ***** dude. I think he's guilty as hell. For both crimes.

Answer 2

I think he is and this time he might be convicted, but who knows. I think there is much more evidence that he was in that hotel room, etc. than even if he was a Nicole's place that night.



When the murders happened I wanted him to get the benefit of the doubt. At first I figured he was not guilty, then all the evidence I thought he was. But with this one, while not as serious as murder, there does seem to be a lot of evidence of what happened. I don't know what, if anything he will actually be convicted of and what the sentence will be. But maybe there is some justice if he is convicted.

Answer 3

Definitely guilty. I am referring to the crime committed in Los Vegas, Nevada. Yes, I think he was guilty of killing his wife and her friend, Ron. Will he be convicted is yet to be seen. I would not be surprised if he walks on this too but, I'd like for him to do his time. He needs to be brought down a noch or two.Just because you are a celebrity doesn't mean you should walk away free from a crime you committed.

Answer 4

Given all of the evidence (enough to convict any ordinary person 10 times over), jury nullification, sensationalism and coverage he is obviously guilty. Still it gave some interesting insights into the way the law works with the even moderately wealthy

Answer 5

guilty guilty guilty he is the man who's guilty : why because he knows he done it and plus his children knows he done it and many others will be watching it televised so they will see that the truth will come as guity if he walks free i will be furious !!!!!!! but he is going nowhere with his book i believe that his interview on the book why if i killed her was banned off tv because people were going to be in shock if they read it or saw the interview i know i am pretty angry about everything about O.J Simpson

Answer 6

I don't know enough details about this current case to make an accurate assessment but I feel if he had had his sports memorabilia stolen, he should have gotten the police involved instead of taking matters into his own hands. It makes him look like he's trying to hide something.



As for the first case, the evidence is overwhelming that he committed those murders and that he got off because he was able to get a hand-picked jury that was sympathetic towards him. They would not have convicted him even if he stood up in court and confessed to the murders.

Answer 7

For which case? In the most recent, I guess he is guilty to a degree, but he was also set up. If he was able to manage his anger, he probably wouldn't have gotten involved and just let the authorities help him get his stuff back.

Answer 8

Opinion is irrelevant. A good chain of evidence, facts & eye witness accounts is where it's at, not the court of public opinion. The court of public opinion is a cesspool. Most opinions are based on rumors, half truths and absolutely no truth. And worst of all, too may people belive all these as complete truth.

Answer 9

Guilty then, guilty now. Hopefully this time around, the jury won't be star-struck and they'll do the right thing.

Answer 10

Money talks. He has been able to hire the most convincing attorneys money can buy.



In my opinion, why is it that when there's an accusation, he's right in the middle of it? It's because he is guilty but keeps getting shyster attorneys that present just enough evidence to keep juries guessing.



I pray they can prove him guilty in this one. He can afford the jail time to rest from all that searching for Ron and Nichol's murderer.

Answer 11

Nobody saw any gloves, or suggested there were any in the hotel room. So he can't have been wearing one.



So he must be innocent under US law. (possibly. I think that might only apply in California.)

Answer 12

Look this is tha truth

oj did it but they culdnt convict him cuz the police tampered with the evidence too much

if they didnt then he wuld prolly be in prison but they obviously did so the jury culd not find him guilty

do the research mutherfukr i kno wat im talkn about

Answer 13

hes guilty

Answer 14

It really doesn't matter anymore because the courts and public are looking for a way to hang him out, so he will be convicted this time. I really think he is innocent though. This time that is.

Answer 15

He was guilty a long time ago.

Answer 16

I think the question should be.. why is O.J Simpson not in prison?

Answer 17

Guilty as sin!

Answer 18

guilty as sin. OJ has operated on the wrong side of the law so long he no longer knows what the right side is.

Answer 19

guilty

Answer 20

Guilty. He should have been sentenced long ago. There is a LOT of dynamite forensics evidence about this.

Answer 21

Guilty...just like before.... and he has money so he will walk again.

Answer 22

Well he's been caught again so if he gets guilty, justice might seem to have been served.

Answer 23

guilty

Answer 24

of course he is but even if hes not a jury will still convict just to get him back 4 last time

Answer 25

guilty

Answer 26

Personal opinions aside, we do not know enough of the facts to make a determination of innocence, or guilt, and it is better left to the jury.

Answer 27

OJ SImpson is guilty as hell on on accounts, even murder.

Answer 28

Definitely guilty! He only got off cause he is famous!



PLCG~

Answer 29

Guilty.

But will he wiggle out of it again?

Only time will tell & the Jury will decide.

As it has already been said, he has money, enough money to buy himself out.

Answer 30

Guilty and the azzhole was also guilty of killing his ex-wife.

Answer 31

no idea, we don't have any evidence in the case to make a decision..../

Answer 32

not guilty!!!! he got off didnt he

Answer 33

Guilty... but he has money... so walk again we will do.

Answer 34

he did it