9/11 Conspiracy Theory?

Question

9/11 Conspiracy Theory?

Answer 1

1. What is this? I saw replays of it on TV soon after it happened. If nobody saw it, why are there videos of it?

2. Different teams clearly have different cameras.

3. & 3. This is wrong.

4. Don't believe stuff you see on Youtube.

The ones lying are the ones who invent the crazy conspiracy theories that have been refuted long ago, for your information. There are always some people who want to believe rubbish.

Answer 2

1) there are multiple videos of both planes hitting the towers



2) of course the cameras will look different, each news team uses a different camera and it will change depending on how far away and the smoke in the air (which is different in every angle).



3) No



4) you're reading into things too much.

Answer 3

The most hoary, trite, cliched conspiracy theories in Rock History 1 Courtney Love killed Kurt Cobain 2 Robert Plant, John Bonham, and Jimmy Page all sold their souls to Satan 3 Elvis Presley and Jim Morrison's deaths were hoaxes Some of the most ridicluous I've heard for sheer lulz Neal Peart was replaced by another Drummer for awhile in the late 70's era. The "Other Drummer" exerted a Satanic influence over Rush Ozzy and Gene Simmons had a "Gross Out" contest the involved (Among other things) ant-eating and animal head-biting off. Rod Stewart had approximately a quart of a *ahem "substance" (that comes from a male) pumped from His stomach in a ER.

Answer 4

What confuses me is that 9/11 spells out "911" what is the number for police and fire depart in the United States. 343 firefighters, 60 police, and eight paramedics died on that day. Was it intentional to put "911"? Or was it just a coincidence?

Answer 5

book:



Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up of 9/11



author: Barrie Zwicker



Book and DVD



Year: 2006

Answer 6

You appear to be using one side of the arguement. Not only is this terrible in drawing conclusions, but your source appears to be a Youtube video. Not only are these bad, but there just opinion based and people bend facts to suit their agenda's.



1)There are hundreds of accounts of people seeing the planes going into the towers. Not to mention the famous first clips of planes hitting the towers. There are thousands of camera's from civilians on the ground reporting the second plane hitting, not to mention a few news camera's.



2)News corporations have different editing teams. Different software as well before its streamed out, thats why they look different when they get beemed out. The editing teams are huge, and are often used to slightly tinker around with the aesthetics of the news feeds to try and differentiate it from other news channels.



3)Camera phones can't be taken out like you stated. Even the most powerful man in the world cant do that. Camera's are hardware. Not software which could be remotely taken out by a virus, and certainly arent dependent on some sort of 'signal' which I get the feeling your implying or the video you got that from implys. You cant stop it. The reason why theres few accounts is the shock of it, the fact it happened in 2001 where a camera phone was about as expensive and as valueable as an Iphone 5 in todays day in time.





3(repeated) - The new york or american "Oh mai Gawd" is famous and is a common element to the accent. Some phrases sound exactly the same in some countries or districts due to inflexibility with the accent. I highly doubt they would record the same 'Oh my god' if these people were to murder 3000 people for other causes. I'd say they could get extra actors. And about the Glass man - these video creators didnt take into account blurs, glitches etc+ 100 other possibility's - That sums up the biaseness of some Youtube videos. This should ring alarm bells with all viewers of that video.







Before you tag me as being someone who believes everything the Government tells me or the media states, im an avid fan of Bill Hicks and George Carlin and will criticise the Government at any given chance and will analyse any story the media state. I've drawn my conclusions from looking at both sides of the arguement and using rational arguement to come to my conclusions.

Answer 7

1. The contrast of each camera is different, as well as the smoke still in the air.

2. If you've ever been to the spot, you would know that you can take shots from different angles.

3. Maybe the news cast was scripted, but the event was real.

4. Stop reading conspiracy theories

5. (your answer to #1) There was TWO towers. One plane hit it in one direction, one plane in another.

Answer 8

"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."

-Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks. Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/features/wanted-by-the-cia-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-14880073.html#ixzz1Xm1WSZqi



The man makes a living hating the US & embarrassing it by exposing its secrets.

And even he's fed up with feeble-minded folks claiming conspiracies.

Think about that.



Think also about the fact that citizens from over 50 countries died on 9/11.

Including celebrities - http://www.edmontonsun.com/2011/09/10/ace-bailey-gretzkys-friend-and-mentor-among-the-911-dead

US security is so lax even Wikileaks amateurs can find out whatever it wants to know.

Only a fool would think the intelligence services of 50+ nations couldn't, wouldn't or didn't breach US security to see if the US was telling the truth about 9/11 or not.

-There's been no denouncements of the US in the media by a coalition of governments.

-There's been no invasion of the US by a coalition seeking vengeance for their murdered citizens.



As for the rest of that nonsense, work your way through this - http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

It's an indepth, systematic debunking of 9/11 conspiracy claims.

Scroll down a bit and you'll find things organized by categories.

Answer 9

Moment of silence for those who died.

Answer 10

The implications of the discovery of unspent aluminothermic explosives and matching residues in World Trade Center dust are staggering. There is no conceivable reason for there to have been tons of high explosives in the Towers except to demolish them, and demolition is blatantly incompatible with the official 9/11 narrative that the skyscrapers collapsed as a result of the jetliner impacts and fires.



The discovery of active thermitic materials adds to a vast body of evidence that the total destruction of the Towers were controlled demolitions, and to the subset of that evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic materials to implement those demolitions.



That discovery also undermines the oft-heard claim that no explosives residues were found, a claim that was never compelling, given the apparent lack of evidence that any official agency looked for evidence of explosive residues of any kind. Worse, the public record shows that NIST not only failed to look for such evidence, it repeatedly evaded requests by scientists and researchers to examine numerous facts indicating explosives and incendiaries.